000 | 02941cam^a2200433^i^4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | UDM01000150403 | ||
003 | UDM | ||
005 | 20210528222041.0 | ||
008 | 150805s2012^^^^enk^^^^^^^^^^^000^^^spa^d | ||
020 |
_a9781107008021 _q(hbk.) |
||
020 |
_a9781107400320 _q(pbk.) |
||
040 |
_aDLC _beng _cDLC _erda |
||
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a342.085 _2K521j 2012 |
100 | 1 |
_9229488 _aKing, Jeff, _d1973-, _eautor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aJudging social rights / _cJeff King, University College London. |
264 | 3 | 1 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c[2012]. |
300 |
_axxvii, 370 páginas ; _c24 cm. |
||
336 |
_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_ano mediado _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolumen _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 0 | _aCambridge studies in constitutional law | |
504 | _aIncluye bibliografía (p. 328-355) e índice. | ||
505 | 0 | _aIntroduction : aims and methods -- Part I. The Case for Constitutional Social Rights -- The case for social rights -- The value of courts in light of the alternatives -- A basic interpretive approach -- Part II. A Theory of Judicial Restraint -- Institutional approaches to judicial restraint -- Democratic legitimacy -- Polycentricity -- Expertise -- Flexibility -- Part III. Incrementalism -- Incrementalism as a general theme. | |
520 | 3 |
_a´States that now contemplate constitutional reform often grapple with the question of whether to constitutionalise social rights. This book presents an argument for why, under the right conditions, doing so can be a good way to advance social justice. In making such a case, the author considers the nature of the social minimum, the role of the court among other institutions, the empirical record of judicial impact and the role of constitutional text. He argues, however, that when enforcing such rights, courts ought to adopt a theory of judicial restraint structured around four principles: democratic legitimacy, polycentricity, expertise and flexibility. These four principles, when taken collectively, commend an incrementalist approach to adjudication. The book combines theoretical, doctrinal, empirical and comparative analysis, and is written to be accessible to lawyers, social scientists, political theorists and human rights advocates´-- _cProvided by publisher. |
|
650 | 1 | 4 |
_9315077 _aDerecho constitucional. _zEstados Unidos. |
650 | 1 | 4 |
_9315592 _aDerechos económicos y sociales _xFilosofía. |
650 | 1 | 4 |
_9315593 _aDerechos económicos y sociales _zEstados Unidos. |
650 | 1 | 4 |
_9332206 _aJusticia social. _zEstados Unidos. |
650 | 1 | 4 |
_9344239 _aPoder judicial. _xAspectos sociales _zEstados Unidos. |
650 | 1 | 4 |
_9345858 _aProblemas políticos y poder judicial _zEstados Unidos. |
942 |
_2ddc _cGEN |
||
991 |
_aDER _aPR15 _aRobles Garza, Magda Yadira |
||
997 |
_aHAVILA _b00 _c20150805 _lUDM01 _h1530 |
||
998 |
_aRGARZA _b00 _c20150806 _lUDM01 _h1625 |
||
999 |
_c138042 _d138042 |
||
900 | _aCS | ||
900 | _aCS | ||
900 | _aDER |