000			03508cam^a2200421^a^4500
001			UDM01000139968
003			UDM
005			20210528221558.0
008			#N/A
020			_a0737747404 _q(hbk.)
020			_a9780737747409 _q(hbk.)
040			_aDLC _cDLC _dYDX _dYDXCP _dQBX _dHALAN _dUN@
082	0	4	_a342.7308 _bS518 2010
245	1	0	_aSex discrimination / _cNoël Merino, book editor.
264	3	1	_aFarmington Hills, MI : _bGreenhaven Press, _cc2010.
300			_a190 páginas
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_ano mediado _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolumen _bnc _2rdacarrier
490	0		_aIssues on trial
504			_aIncluye bibliografía.
505	0		_aDissenting opinion: current pay disparities between men and women are acts of sex discrimination / Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- Ledbetter was not unjustly decided / Stuart Taylor Jr. -- Congress should overturn Ledbetter / Dahlia Lithwick -- The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act will create many problems / Andrew M. Grossman.
505	0		_aMen receiving alimony still suffer stigmatization years after Orr / Anita Raghavan -- Women are increasingly paying alimony as equality requires / Betsy Schiffman -- Upholding affirmative action for working women -- Case overview: Johnson v. Transportation Agency (1987). The court´s decision: taking account of sex in order to eliminate underrepresentation in employment is constitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: in employment, taking sex into account for any reason is sex discrimination / Antonin Scalia -- Brennanism / Daniel Seligman -- The relevance of Johnson for ad hoc affirmative action is unclear / Michael Starr and Adam J. Heft -- Validating limits on suing employers for sex discrimination -- Case overview: Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2007). The court´s decision: filing for pay discrimination is subject to time limits / Samuel A. Alito Jr. --^
505	0		_aSex discrimination in military benefits -- Case overview: Frontiero v. Richardson (1973). The court´s decision: differential treatment of men and women is unconstitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- The statute in question treating men and women differently is reasonable / Erwin N. Griswold, Harlington Wood Jr., Mark L. Evans -- The decision in Frontiero was a key step toward equality for women / Christine Basic -- The Frontiero decision helped women achieve equality in the military / Lory Manning -- The reasoning in Frontiero protecting women supports protection of homosexuals / Thomas B. Scheffey -- Striking down statutes requiring alimony only of men -- Case overview: Orr v. Orr (1979). The court´s decision: legislation distributing benefits and burdens by gender is unconstitutional / William J. Brennan Jr. -- Dissenting opinion: no sex discrimination exists for an individual who is not harmed / William H. Rehnquist --^
520	3		_aPresents articles regarding sex discrimination in the United States, including cases relating to military benefits, divorce settlements, affirmative action for women, and sex discrmination in the workplace.
650	1	4	_9317007 _aDiscriminación sexual _xLegislación _zEstados Unidos.
700	1		_9246346 _aMerino, Noël. _eautor
830		0	_9571571 _aIssues on trial.
942			_2ddc _cGEN
991			_aBSP
991			_aC0 _bUN@
997			_aHZ _b00 _c20140722 _lUDM01 _h1027
998			_aBATCH _b00 _c20140911 _lUDM01 _h0532
999			_c127804 _d127804
900			_aCS
900			_aCS
900			_aDER