000 | 03352cam^a2200409^a^4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | UDM01000139966 | ||
003 | UDM | ||
005 | 20210528221558.0 | ||
008 | 111122s2006^^^^miua^^^^^b^^^^001^0^eng^^ | ||
020 | _a073772787X | ||
020 | _a9780737727876 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _cDLC _dIG# _dBAKER _dGC0 _dOCO _dBTCTA _dQBX _dYDXCP _dVFY _dCQU _dAZFX8 _dUN@ |
||
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a342.7308 _bR121 2006 |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aRacial discrimination / _cMitchell Young, book editor. |
264 | 3 | 1 |
_aDetroit [Mich.] : _bGreenhaven Press, _cc2006. |
300 |
_a183 páginas : _bilustraciones |
||
336 |
_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_ano mediado _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolumen _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 0 | _aIssues on trial | |
504 | _aIncluye bibliografía. | ||
505 | 0 | _aUpholding legalized segregation. Case overview: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) The Court´s opinion: forced segregation is constitutional / Henry B. Brown -- Dissenting opinion: the Plessy decision will lead to racial conflict / John Harlan -- Segregation denies blacks libery and equality / Albion W. Tourgée -- Plessy was a major setback for black civil rights / A. Leon Higginbotham Jr. -- The reasoning of Plessy has not been overturned / Charles A. Lofgren. Outlawing school segregation. Case overview: Brown v. Board of Education (1954). The District Court´s opinion: school segregation is constitutional / Walter Huxman -- The Supreme Court´s opinion: segregated schools are unconstitutional / Earl Warren -- Brown violates states´ rights / A group of Congressmen -- Equality in education is more important than integration / Derrick A. Bell -- Brown was a landmark for civil rights / Edward Lazarus -- The effects of Brown are being eroded / Phillip Boyle. Declaring hate crime laws constitutional. Case overview: Wisconsin v. Mitchell (1993). The court´s opinion: hate crime laws do not violate free speech rights / William H. Rehnquist -- Hate crimes´ destructiveness justifies stricter sentences / Henry J. Silberberg -- Mitchell was a poorly conceived ruling / Jeffrey Rosen -- The debate over hate crime laws / John Spong. Legalizing racial preferences in college admissions. Case overview: Grutter v. Bollinger (2003). The court´s opinion: racial preferences are permitted in college admissions / Sandra Day O´Connor -- Dissenting opinion: racial balancing in college admissions in unconstitutional / William H. Rehnquist -- Race-based college admissions violate individual rights / A. Lee Parks Jr. -- Grutter will lead to disguised racial discrimination / Carl Cohen -- Grutter will lead to increased opportunities for minorities / William G. Bowen. | |
520 | 3 | _aPresents extracts and analysis of recent court decisions dealing with racial discrimination, covering such issues as outlawing school segregation, prosecution of hate crimes, and racial balancing in the college admission process. | |
650 | 1 | 4 |
_9316975 _aDiscriminación racial. _xLegislación _zEstados Unidos. |
650 | 1 | 4 |
_9350307 _aSegregación racial _zEstados Unidos. |
700 | 1 |
_9298248 _aYoung, Mitchell. _eautor |
|
830 | 0 |
_9571571 _aIssues on trial. |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cGEN |
||
991 | _aBSP | ||
991 |
_aC0 _bUN@ |
||
997 |
_aHZ _b00 _c20140722 _lUDM01 _h1027 |
||
998 |
_aBATCH-UPD _b00 _c20150424 _lUDM01 _h0707 |
||
999 |
_c127802 _d127802 |
||
900 | _aCS | ||
900 | _aCS | ||
900 | _aDER |