000 | 01691cam^a22003494a^4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | UDM01000133003 | ||
003 | UDM | ||
005 | 20210528221239.0 | ||
008 | 101021s2009^^^^cau^^^^^^b^^^^001^0^eng^c | ||
020 |
_a0804752745 _q(hbk. : alk. paper) |
||
020 |
_a9780804752749 _q(hbk. : alk. paper) |
||
040 |
_aCSt/DLC _cDLC _dYDXCP _dC#P _dCDX _dBWX _dIG# _dONS _dGEBAY _dUN@ |
||
082 | 0 | 4 |
_a347.7353 _bR317w 2009 |
100 | 1 |
_9265714 _aRedish, Martin H, _eautor |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aWholesale justice : _bconstitutional democracy and the problem of the class action lawsuit / _cMartin H. Redish. |
264 | 3 | 1 |
_aStanford, Calif. : _bStanford Law Books, _cc2009. |
300 | _ax, 317 páginas | ||
336 |
_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_ano mediado _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolumen _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
504 | _aIncluye bibliografĂa. | ||
505 | 0 | _aIntroduction : class actions, legal history, and liberal democracy -- Class actions and the democratic difficulty -- The Supreme Court, the Rules Enabling Act, and the politicization of the class action -- The class action as political theory -- Class actions, litigant autonomy, and the goals of procedural due process -- Settlement class actions, the case-or-controversy requirement, and the nature of the adjudicatory process -- Conclusion : the role of liberal political theory in the class action debate. | |
650 | 1 | 4 |
_935975 _aProcedimiento civil _zEstados Unidos. |
651 | 4 |
_99753 _aEstados Unidos _xDerecho constitucional. |
|
942 |
_2ddc _cGEN |
||
991 |
_aC0 _bUN@ |
||
991 | _aPYS | ||
997 |
_aHZ _b00 _c20140722 _lUDM01 _h1026 |
||
998 |
_aBATCH-UPD _b00 _c20150424 _lUDM01 _h0252 |
||
999 |
_c120944 _d120944 |
||
900 | _aDER |